But perhaps its strangest offshoot is the documentary Memory: The Origins of Alien.
Part making-of story and part film-studies thesis, Memory (its name comes from the original title of Dan O’Bannon’s screenplay) offers what writer-director Alexandre O. Philippe calls “a deep dive into the mechanisms of cinema, the process of filmmakers, and into how and why audiences respond to certain films in the way they do”.
We live now in a culture saturated in filmed images, but very little of it ascends to the level of shared experience, says Philippe. Game of Thrones was an exception, “but there are very few now that have these moments – like the chest burster, like the Psycho shower scene – that completely traumatise a generation. They are very rare.”
Philippe – who was born in Switzerland but moved to the US 26 years ago with dreams of becoming a professional golfer – is fascinated by these cut-through moments. His last film was 78/52, a forensic examination of the 78 seconds and 52 cuts that comprise the shower scene from Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho. His next – which he was about to take to the Venice Film Festival when we spoke earlier this week – is a meditation on The Exorcist.
What he sees in these films is an expression not just of their makers’ intentions and talents, but of something far greater – our collective unconscious at play.
“There are certain movies that become phenomena because they express ideas that we need to see in our culture at a particular time,” he says. “And rarely are we actually conscious of the fact that we need to see those ideas being expressed.”
Memory traces the series of coincidences that brought its three key creative drivers – writer O’Bannon, director Ridley Scott and designer HR Giger – to the project, as well as the late decision to cast Sigourney Weaver as Ripley, a role originally conceived as male.
“I’m very interested in the idea of coincidence versus fate,” says Philippe. “The way I see it, nothing is ever completely coincidental and nothing is ever completely fated. Coincidence can become fate.
“You could argue that it is audiences that willed Alien to life,” he continues. “Had Dan O’Bannon, Ridley Scott and HR Giger not been on the frequency for that myth, someone else would have had to be. When you look at the number of coincidences that happened for Alien to be Alien you have to wonder if there were greater forces at work.”
The thing that most desperately needed to be expressed, he argues, was a challenge to the “patriarchal imbalance”. Kane’s “rape” by the alien – by the face hugger that latches onto his face and inserts its egg via a tube shoved down his throat – and the shocking experience of “birthing” the alien through his chest “jolted people into a feeling of unease”, he says.
“There were things that happen to women that were suddenly transposed to Kane,” he continues. “I don’t think that was being processed consciously – I don’t think the studio was thinking, ‘Oh yeah, here’s $11 million, go make a male-rape movie in space’. I don’t believe O’Bannon, Giger and Scott were thinking along those lines either.”
But they were images and ideas that we needed to see in order to deal with the underlying tensions in our culture, he believes.
“What makes Alien so amazing is that it took 40 years for society to process and to start having a dialogue about those images and ideas,” he adds. “Alien is, in a way, much more contemporary today than it was 40 years ago.”
Memory: The Origins of Alien is on limited release.
Karl is a senior entertainment writer at The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald.