OPINION…..FILM MAKING , CENSORSHIP & SOCIAL REALISM : The Hunt Must Be Shown, but Not in the Current Political Uproar

0 0
Read Time6 Minute, 10 Second
OPINION.....FILM MAKING , CENSORSHIP & SOCIAL REALISM : The Hunt Must Be Shown, but Not in the Current Political Uproar

“The Hunt” has been tracked, trashed and degraded. It’s made an “enemy” of Fox News and its viewers — based on two 30 second trailers. Based on the uproar against the alleged political satire (I have NOT seen the movie), Universal pulled the marketing approach and on Saturday postponed release of the movie that involves people hunting people. 

Pardon the pun, but everyone is jumping the gun. A Marshall University graduate and former President of Production for Columbia Pictures once told me he welcomes criticism of ALL films. What he objected to was — blasting the film before its been viewed. I adopted his “creed” in my long history of reviewing/critiquing movies. My eyes and ears have endured much “abuse,” but I’ve not walked out on a movie that I later penned a review. 

A little message from the other side primed my ears to the misuse of video games and violent films as an “excuse” for diagnosing mass murders.  In the heat of the week, I had tipped leaning to do something about guns, particularly the AK’s.

However, a source quoted me recent crime states: 1 in 19 homicides are committed with a handgun (1 in 9 of gun deaths which incorporates suicide). That’s the rubric — nearly all of the random massacres involve automatic AK’s defined as weapons of war, not sport or self defense. Most of the random attacks of public violence at schools, places of worship, concerts, or other gatherings have the shooter carrying full magazine and an AK type of weapon. The shooter may murder 25-50 people at a nightclub, but  every single weekend in , for example, Chicago , their total body count equals or exceeds those murdered in a mass attack.

OPINION.....FILM MAKING , CENSORSHIP & SOCIAL REALISM : The Hunt Must Be Shown, but Not in the Current Political Uproar

Blumhouse produced the societal satire which appears to pit Red State conservatives (deplorables) against Blue State liberals (elites). It’s a group known for meshing horror/thriller and satire ii.e. BlacKkKlansman, Get Out , The Purge series and Whiplash.

When violent incident strike, sooner or later popular culture (comic books, films, video games) catch hell. In the ultimate show of profit and political correctness, Wal Mart has ordered employees not to PLAY violent content IN STORE But you can still make your purchase there of the item. Weapons too. 

“Witnessing violence whether on screen or in games desensitizes people to it, ” explained S.Dean, a psychiatric nurse. 

Meanwhile an international performer quipped that blaming games or movies is “an old excuse that’s been trotted out for decades. Now it comes up every time a mass shooting occurs.” She contends “it’s not the root of the problem,” rather bad parenting.

“The people who go on mass shooting rampages usually have dysfunctional home lives,” the performer added.

OPINION.....FILM MAKING , CENSORSHIP & SOCIAL REALISM : The Hunt Must Be Shown, but Not in the Current Political Uproar

S.Jeffers, a MU graduate, told HNN: I don’t personally feel violent video games and movies play a part in gun violence. For the most part guns are easily accessible to anyone. It’s easy for them to fall into the wrong. I feel like anymore most of the gun violence is centered around drug activity. Half the drug people who are from Detroit come here for the weapons because they are so easy to obtain.”

Mental health can play a role, but I would not say it plays a role in every situation,” Jeffers said. “Children can be brought up in dysfunctional homes, but it doesn’t necessarily mean that’s the reason they go out and shoot someone.  As far as AKs go, if a person wanted one they can get them,  but I don’t think it’s a weapon that should be easily accessible to every one.”

Dave Williams, a mental health counselor and freelance writer, explained:

“Mental illness is at the root of mass shootings. There’s just so many people disenfranchised from society. They are living in the real world and are responding to internal stimuli. Modern medicine with therapy can work miracles, but the trick is getting people the help they need and keep them on those meds. At the hospital I work at, we see a lot of the same patients. They quit taking their meds and get shot back out there somewhere.”

“I don’t blame violent games, music, or movies. Hate has more to do with it than that stuff. There is just so much anger in the world. So many people are consumed with hatred. They just want to blame something…to blam and retaliate.”

Ken Schrupp writing in The California Review apparently had had an opportunity to either view or read portions of “The Hunt’s” script:

OPINION.....FILM MAKING , CENSORSHIP & SOCIAL REALISM : The Hunt Must Be Shown, but Not in the Current Political Uproar

“Before boycotting the film, consider that the film’s protagonists—from whose point of view the movie progresses and with whom one is ostensibly meant to sympathize with—are the “deplorables.” If the film were promoting violence against conservatives, surely it would have been from the point of view of the hunters, not the hunted. Second, the film’s villains are a satirical if not wholly inaccurate vision of how many conservatives view the liberal elite. “We paid for everything, so this country belongs to us,” says the film’s antagonist before she uses a stiletto to terminate an unfortunate “deplorable” who had been chosen for slaughter based on his social media activity. Furthermore, the use of violence in the film against conservatives does not necessarily normalize violence against them. Indeed, the film’s protagonists ultimately do get “even” with their hunters by their own bouts of gratuitous violence… “

Schrupp, first, defends the right of conservatives to oppose the movie; it’s their free speech:

Free speech exists to protect us from the tyranny of an imposed cultural homogeneity that suffocates dissent with censorship and social ostracization, and conservative efforts to prevent the film’s distribution are a manifestation of this very tyranny they purportedly aim to prevent; it is hypocrisy of the first order for those who condemn liberals’ use of social media to censor and censure conservatives then attempt to use the same tools for the same ends in the name of “safety.”

“[Free speech] may indeed best serve its high purpose when it induces a condition of unrest, creates dissatisfaction with conditions as they are, or even stirs people to anger. Speech is often provocative and challenging. It may strike at prejudices and preconceptions and have profound unsettling effects as it presses for acceptance of an idea,” wrote Justice William O. Douglas in the Supreme Court’s increasingly prescient majority opinion for Terminiello v. City of Chicago. In its ruling, the court ultimately overturned the conviction of a man whose words of racial animosity roused a crowd of opposition so great that the police were unable to maintain order, deciding that one’s right to speak one’s opinion, even in the face of a hostile public, trumped the immediate requirements of public safety. Indeed, we conservatives would be well served to remember that free speech does not exist to protect our feelings and comfort—it exists to protect everyone’s rights. 

For a nation that is forgetting its constitutional rights and obligations, opting to dehumanize opposition at the expense of rational reconciliation, and facing a partisan divide not seen since the late 19th centuryThe Hunt is an important, necessary film that deserves the chance to see the light of day. “

According to Universal, it just WILL  not be in September.